In fact, for those of us who have seen the film, it is even better than the actual film. I don't know if the actors here are actually singing, but, if dubbed, they sound better than the feeble attempts by Ryan Gosling, and especially that no talent Emma Stone, in this over inflated film.
The other brilliant thing is that it covers the visualization and vocal homage of "La La Land," without being the length of the film. I know it did not run four hours, but, sitting through it, sure felt like it.
It is just short enough to be acknowledged as skillfully made, which is more than can be said for "La La Land."
For those having seen the film, you will get it.
And for those who have not, this ad saves one the trouble of sitting through something so unbearable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wonder what will be spoofed next?????????????
Why do so many people think Ryan Gosling is so handsome and talented.
ReplyDeleteI don't see it.
ReplyDeleteVictoria,
I actually think Ryan Gosling
is handsome and talented. The
problem is he is limited. All
the skills he learned for "La
La Land" he instantly forgot,
and his dancing showed a lack of
flexibility that someone really
trained should have.
Look at one of his early films,
"The Notebook." He is the one to
watch, like James Dean or Warren
Beatty in "Splendor In The Grass."
Veery impassioned.
Interesting; i never saw that movie.
ReplyDeleteI did read the book.
And never read another Nicholas Sparks book again.
ReplyDeleteVictoria,
I never read Nicholas Sparks.
Originally, I had no intention
of seeing the movie, but some
critics compared it to "Splendor
In The Grass,' and I thought they
were kidding. But Gosling's
performance matched both
Natalie Wood's and Warren Beatty's.
Okay, I will give Ryan a chance lol.
ReplyDeleteAfter all, I have only seen One of his movies.
It was called "Lars and the Real Girl"
ReplyDeleteI recommend "The Notebook,"
"Murder By Numbres," "Half Neslon,"
where he plays an inner city teacher,
and I believe netted an Oscar nomination,
and "The Ides Of March."