Like Tennessee Williams, Dickens had a way of glossing over characters, revealing what they actually are, without naming it by word.
In "David Copperfield," the words "alcoholic" and "enabler" are never mentioned. Yet, that is clearly what Mr. Wickfield, and his daughter, Agnes, respectively are. Likewise, the word prostitution is never mentioned, but in "David Copperfield," that is what Martha Endell and Little Em'ly fall into.
Same with Nancy in "Oliver Twist."
Which brings me to Bill Sykes. Though the 1968 film version of the stage musical,"Oliver!" sanitized the darker elements of Dickens' story, Oliver Reed's Bill Sykes one of film's most chilling portraits of evil, surpassing even Robert Newton in the 1948 David Lean gold standard versionof the story.
The way he comes across, the way he treats Nancy, even his dog, it is would not surprise me, with all those boys hanging around in Fagin's lair, that some were not abused sexually. And Sykes would certainly be the one to do it. But, while such things most likely went on, Dickens did not set out to explore it. I am sure he was aware of it, but if the publishers of the day could not deal outright with alcoholism or prostitution, it certainly could not handle pedophilia.
Think about this, the next time you read "Oliver Twist." It makes an odd kind of sense.
Of such ideas are nightmares made!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Even Shakespeare had to disguise the “unacceptable” elements!
ReplyDelete